The Mean-Value Property Characterizes Harmonic Functions

Contents
  1. Statement
  2. Differentiation under the integral sign
  3. A radial mollifier
  4. The mollification reproduces the function
  5. Proof of the theorem

This appendix proves the continuous form of the converse half of Theorem 14.69 (Partial Differential Equations): a function that is merely continuous on an open set and equals its own spherical average over every ball whose closure the set contains is automatically infinitely differentiable there, and harmonic. The chapter proves the converse only for \(u \in C^{2}\), because the argument it uses decides the sign of a Laplacian whose existence is exactly what is in question (Remark 14.70). The gap is closed here by constructing the smoothing device the chapter does not have — a radial mollifier — and showing that convolution against it returns the function unchanged. Once that is done the chapter's own sign argument applies verbatim.

Nothing is quoted. Everything below is built from the Riemann integral of a continuous function over a compact region, the mean value theorem of one-variable calculus, and the polar decomposition of a volume integral in \(\R^{3}\) already used in Lemma 14.58 and in the proof of Theorem 14.69; in particular the Lebesgue theory that Real Analysis deliberately does not develop is nowhere needed, because every integrand that appears is continuous with compact support.

Throughout, \(\Omega \subset \R^{3}\) is open and nonempty, \(B(\vect{x},r) = \set{\vect{y} \in \R^{3} \mid \abs{\vect{y}-\vect{x}} < r}\), and \(M_{u}(\vect{x},r)\) is the spherical mean Equation (14.54). The space is the observed three-dimensional one; nothing in the argument depends on that choice beyond the numerical factor \(4\pi\).

Statement

Definition A16.1 (Mean-value property).

A function \(u \in C^{0}(\Omega)\) has the mean-value property on \(\Omega\) if and only if

\begin{equation}\tag{A16.1} u(\vect{x}) = M_{u}(\vect{x},r) = \frac{1}{4\pi}\int_{S^{2}}u(\vect{x}+r\vect{n})\,\dd\Omega \end{equation}

for every \(\vect{x} \in \Omega\) and every \(r>0\) with \(\overline{B(\vect{x},r)} \subset \Omega\). Rests on Equation (14.54) and Definition 10.2.

Theorem A16.2 (Converse of the mean-value property).

Let \(u \in C^{0}(\Omega)\) have the mean-value property of Definition A16.1. Then \(u \in C^{\infty}(\Omega)\) and \(\nabla^{2}u = 0\) on \(\Omega\); that is, \(u\) is harmonic in the sense of Definition 14.66. Consequently the two conditions harmonic and continuous with the mean-value property define the same class of functions. Rests on Definition A16.1, Theorem 14.69 and Definition 14.66.

The proof occupies the rest of the section: an elementary lemma on differentiating an integral with respect to a parameter (Differentiation under the integral sign), the construction of the mollifier and the smoothness of the convolution (A radial mollifier), the reproduction identity \(u * \rho_{\varepsilon} = u\) (The mollification reproduces the function), and the assembly (Proof of the theorem).

Differentiation under the integral sign

The one analytic tool the argument needs is stated and proved here, in the only form it will be used: the integrand is continuous, the domain of integration is a fixed compact set, and the parameter runs over an open set.

Lemma A16.3 (Differentiation under the integral sign).

Let \(U \subset \R^{3}\) be open, let \(Q \subset \R^{3}\) be a compact box, and let \(F : U \times Q \longrightarrow \R\) be such that \(F\) and the partial derivative \(\pp F/\pp x^{i}\) (taken in the first argument) are continuous on \(U \times Q\) for one fixed \(i\). Then

\begin{equation}\tag{A16.2} g(\vect{x}) = \int_{Q}F(\vect{x},\vect{y})\,\dd^{3}y \end{equation}

has a continuous partial derivative \(\pp_{i}g\) on \(U\), and

\begin{equation}\tag{A16.3} \pp_{i}g(\vect{x}) = \int_{Q}\pdv{F}{x^{i}}(\vect{x},\vect{y})\,\dd^{3}y\ep \end{equation}

Rests on Definition 11.98 and Theorem 10.11.

Proof.

Derives Lemma A16.3. Fix \(\vect{x} \in U\) and choose \(r>0\) with \(\overline{B(\vect{x},r)} \subset U\). The set \(\overline{B(\vect{x},r)}\times Q\) is compact, so \(\pp F/\pp x^{i}\) is uniformly continuous on it: given \(\varepsilon>0\) there is \(\delta \in (0,r)\) such that

\begin{equation}\tag{A16.4} \abs{\vect{x}'-\vect{x}''} < \delta \quad\implies\quad \abs{\pdv{F}{x^{i}}(\vect{x}',\vect{y}) - \pdv{F}{x^{i}}(\vect{x}'',\vect{y})} < \varepsilon \end{equation}

for every \(\vect{y} \in Q\), the bound being uniform in \(\vect{y}\) — which is the whole content of uniform continuity on the product and the reason the compactness of \(Q\) is needed.

Let \(\vect{e}_{i}\) be the \(i\)-th coordinate vector and let \(0 < \abs{h} < \delta\). For each fixed \(\vect{y}\) the mean value theorem applied to the function \(s \longmapsto F(\vect{x}+s\vect{e}_{i},\vect{y})\) on the interval between \(0\) and \(h\) supplies \(\theta = \theta(h,\vect{y}) \in (0,1)\) with

\begin{equation}\tag{A16.5} \frac{F(\vect{x}+h\vect{e}_{i},\vect{y}) - F(\vect{x},\vect{y})}{h} = \pdv{F}{x^{i}}\bigl(\vect{x}+\theta h\vect{e}_{i},\vect{y}\bigr)\ep \end{equation}

Both sides of Equation (A16.5) are continuous in \(\vect{y}\) — the left side manifestly, and hence the right side as well, whatever the measurability of \(\theta\) — so both are Riemann integrable over \(Q\). Subtracting Equation (A16.3) and using Equation (A16.4) with \(\abs{\theta h} < \delta\),

\begin{equation}\tag{A16.6} \abs{\frac{g(\vect{x}+h\vect{e}_{i}) - g(\vect{x})}{h} - \int_{Q}\pdv{F}{x^{i}}(\vect{x},\vect{y})\,\dd^{3}y} \le \int_{Q}\varepsilon\,\dd^{3}y = \varepsilon\,\abs{Q}\ec \end{equation}

with \(\abs{Q}\) the volume of the box. Since \(\varepsilon\) was arbitrary the difference quotient converges, which is Equation (A16.3). Continuity of \(\pp_{i}g\) follows from the same estimate with \(\vect{x}'' = \vect{x}\) and \(\vect{x}'\) a nearby point, the integral of a quantity bounded by \(\varepsilon\) being bounded by \(\varepsilon\abs{Q}\).

Remark A16.4.

Lemma A16.3 iterates: if \(F\) and all its partial derivatives in \(\vect{x}\) of every order are continuous on \(U\times Q\), then \(g \in C^{\infty}(U)\) and every derivative may be taken under the integral sign, because the conclusion of the lemma is again a function of the same form with \(\pp F/\pp x^{i}\) in place of \(F\).

A radial mollifier

The device the chapter lacks is a smooth, radial, non-negative function supported in a ball and of unit integral. Its existence is not obvious: a function that is analytic cannot vanish on an open set without vanishing identically, so the construction must use a function that is smooth and not analytic. There is exactly one standard source of such a function.

Lemma A16.5 (The flat exponential).

Define \(f : \R \longrightarrow \R\) by

\begin{equation}\tag{A16.7} f(t) = \begin{cases} \ee^{-1/t}\ec & t > 0\ec\\ 0\ec & t \le 0\ep \end{cases} \end{equation}

Then \(f \in C^{\infty}(\R)\), \(f^{(n)}(0) = 0\) for every \(n\), and \(f(t)>0\) exactly for \(t>0\). Rests on Definition 11.98 and Theorem 11.38.

Proof.

Derives Lemma A16.5. Derivatives for \(t>0\). We claim that for every \(n \ge 0\) there is a polynomial \(p_{n}\) with

\begin{equation}\tag{A16.8} f^{(n)}(t) = p_{n}\!\left(\frac{1}{t}\right)\ee^{-1/t}\ec \qquad t>0\ep \end{equation}

For \(n=0\) take \(p_{0} = 1\). Differentiating Equation (A16.8) and using \(\dd(1/t)/\dd t = -1/t^{2}\),

\begin{equation}\tag{A16.9} f^{(n+1)}(t) = \left[-\frac{1}{t^{2}}\,p_{n}'\!\left(\frac1t\right) + \frac{1}{t^{2}}\,p_{n}\!\left(\frac1t\right)\right]\ee^{-1/t}\ec \end{equation}

so Equation (A16.8) holds at \(n+1\) with \(p_{n+1}(s) = s^{2}\bigl(p_{n}(s) - p_{n}'(s)\bigr)\).

Decay at the origin. For \(s>0\) and any integer \(m \ge 0\) the exponential series gives \(\ee^{s} \ge s^{m+1}/(m+1)!\), hence \(s^{m}\ee^{-s} \le (m+1)!/s \longrightarrow 0\) as \(s \to +\infty\). Consequently, for any polynomial \(p\),

\begin{equation}\tag{A16.10} \lim_{t\to0^{+}} p\!\left(\frac1t\right)\ee^{-1/t} = \lim_{s\to+\infty} p(s)\,\ee^{-s} = 0\ep \end{equation}

Derivatives at the origin. We show by induction that \(f^{(n)}\) exists everywhere, is continuous, and \(f^{(n)}(0)=0\). For \(n=0\) this is Equation (A16.10) with \(p=1\). Assume it at \(n\). For \(t<0\) the difference quotient of \(f^{(n)}\) at \(0\) vanishes identically; for \(t>0\) it is

\begin{equation}\tag{A16.11} \frac{f^{(n)}(t)-f^{(n)}(0)}{t} = \frac{1}{t}\,p_{n}\!\left(\frac1t\right)\ee^{-1/t} = \left[s\,p_{n}(s)\right]\ee^{-s}\ec \qquad s = \frac1t\ec \end{equation}

which tends to \(0\) by Equation (A16.10) applied to the polynomial \(s\,p_{n}(s)\). Hence \(f^{(n+1)}(0)\) exists and is \(0\). It is continuous at \(0\) because \(f^{(n+1)}(t) = p_{n+1}(1/t)\ee^{-1/t} \to 0\) as \(t\to0^{+}\) by Equation (A16.10) again, and vanishes for \(t<0\). Positivity for \(t>0\) is immediate.

Definition A16.6 (The standard radial mollifier).

With \(f\) of Equation (A16.7) set

\begin{equation}\tag{A16.12} \rho(\vect{x}) = c_{0}\,f\!\left(1-\abs{\vect{x}}^{2}\right)\ec \qquad c_{0}^{-1} = \int_{\R^{3}}f\!\left(1-\abs{\vect{x}}^{2}\right) \dd^{3}x\ec \end{equation}

and, for \(\varepsilon > 0\), \(\rho_{\varepsilon}(\vect{x}) = \varepsilon^{-3}\rho(\vect{x}/\varepsilon)\). Rests on Lemma A16.5.

Lemma A16.7 (Properties of the mollifier).

\(\rho_{\varepsilon} \in C^{\infty}(\R^{3})\); it is non-negative, vanishes outside \(\overline{B(\vect{0},\varepsilon)}\), depends on \(\vect{x}\) only through \(\abs{\vect{x}}\), and \(\int_{\R^{3}}\rho_{\varepsilon}\,\dd^{3}x = 1\). Rests on Definition A16.6 and Lemma A16.5.

Proof.

Derives Lemma A16.7. \(\abs{\vect{x}}^{2} = x^{2}+y^{2}+z^{2}\) is a polynomial, hence \(C^{\infty}\), and the composition of a \(C^{\infty}\) function of one variable with a \(C^{\infty}\) function of three is \(C^{\infty}\) by the chain rule (Proposition 11.104); this is where Lemma A16.5 is used, and it is the only place where smoothness that is not analyticity is needed. The argument \(1-\abs{\vect{x}}^{2}\) is positive exactly on the open unit ball and non-positive outside it, so \(\rho > 0\) there and \(\rho = 0\) elsewhere; in particular \(\rho\) vanishes on a whole neighbourhood of every point of \(\abs{\vect{x}} = 1\) together with all its derivatives. The normalizing integral in Equation (A16.12) is the integral of a continuous non-negative function that is positive on an open set, hence finite and strictly positive, so \(c_{0}\) is well defined. Radial dependence is manifest. Finally the substitution \(\vect{x} = \varepsilon\vect{z}\), whose Jacobian is \(\varepsilon^{3}\), gives \(\int\rho_{\varepsilon}(\vect{x})\dd^{3}x = \int\rho(\vect{z})\dd^{3}z = 1\), and rescales the support to \(\abs{\vect{x}} \le \varepsilon\).

Definition A16.8 (Mollification).

For \(u \in C^{0}(\Omega)\) and \(\varepsilon>0\) put

\begin{equation}\tag{A16.13} \Omega_{\varepsilon} = \set{\vect{x} \in \Omega \mid \overline{B(\vect{x},\varepsilon)} \subset \Omega}\ec \end{equation}

an open subset of \(\Omega\) whose union over \(\varepsilon>0\) is \(\Omega\), and define on it

\begin{equation}\tag{A16.14} u_{\varepsilon}(\vect{x}) = \int_{\overline{B(\vect{0},\varepsilon)}} \rho_{\varepsilon}(\vect{z})\,u(\vect{x}-\vect{z})\,\dd^{3}z = \int_{\overline{B(\vect{x},\varepsilon)}} \rho_{\varepsilon}(\vect{x}-\vect{y})\,u(\vect{y})\,\dd^{3}y\ep \end{equation}

Rests on Definitions 10.2 and A16.6.

The two integrals in Equation (A16.14) agree by the substitution \(\vect{y} = \vect{x}-\vect{z}\), of unit Jacobian; both integrands are continuous on a compact set, so both are ordinary Riemann integrals. That \(\Omega_{\varepsilon}\) is open, and that every point of \(\Omega\) lies in some \(\Omega_{\varepsilon}\), is immediate from \(\Omega\) being open.

Proposition A16.9 (The mollification is smooth).

\(u_{\varepsilon} \in C^{\infty}(\Omega_{\varepsilon})\), and every partial derivative may be taken under the integral sign in the second form of Equation (A16.14). Rests on Lemmas A16.3 and A16.7.

Proof.

Derives Proposition A16.9. Fix \(\vect{x}_{0} \in \Omega_{\varepsilon}\) and \(\sigma>0\) so small that \(\overline{B(\vect{x}_{0},\sigma+\varepsilon)} \subset \Omega\); let \(U = B(\vect{x}_{0},\sigma)\) and let \(Q\) be a closed box containing \(\overline{B(\vect{x}_{0},\sigma+\varepsilon)}\). Extend \(u\) from \(\overline{B(\vect{x}_{0},\sigma+\varepsilon)}\) to \(Q\) by any continuous function — the extension is irrelevant, because for \(\vect{x} \in U\) the factor \(\rho_{\varepsilon}(\vect{x}-\vect{y})\) already vanishes for \(\vect{y}\) outside \(\overline{B(\vect{x}_{0},\sigma+\varepsilon)}\), so

\begin{equation}\tag{A16.15} u_{\varepsilon}(\vect{x}) = \int_{Q} F(\vect{x},\vect{y})\,\dd^{3}y\ec \qquad F(\vect{x},\vect{y}) = \rho_{\varepsilon}(\vect{x}-\vect{y})\,u(\vect{y})\ec \end{equation}

for every \(\vect{x} \in U\). In Equation (A16.15) the whole dependence on the parameter \(\vect{x}\) sits in the factor \(\rho_{\varepsilon}\), which by Lemma A16.7 is \(C^{\infty}\); hence \(F\) and all its \(\vect{x}\)-derivatives of every order,

\begin{equation}\tag{A16.16} \pp^{\alpha}_{\vect{x}}F(\vect{x},\vect{y}) = \bigl(\pp^{\alpha}\rho_{\varepsilon}\bigr) (\vect{x}-\vect{y})\,u(\vect{y})\ec \end{equation}

are continuous on \(U\times Q\), being products of continuous functions. Lemma A16.3 and Remark A16.4 therefore apply and give \(u_{\varepsilon} \in C^{\infty}(U)\) with \(\pp^{\alpha}u_{\varepsilon}(\vect{x}) = \int_{Q}\bigl(\pp^{\alpha}\rho_{\varepsilon}\bigr) (\vect{x}-\vect{y})\,u(\vect{y})\,\dd^{3}y\). Since \(\vect{x}_{0} \in \Omega_{\varepsilon}\) was arbitrary, the conclusion holds on all of \(\Omega_{\varepsilon}\).

The mollification reproduces the function

This is the step at which the mean-value hypothesis enters, and it is the reason the mollifier was required to be radial.

Proposition A16.10 (Reproduction identity).

Let \(u \in C^{0}(\Omega)\) have the mean-value property. Then

\begin{equation}\tag{A16.17} u_{\varepsilon}(\vect{x}) = u(\vect{x}) \qquad\text{for every } \vect{x} \in \Omega_{\varepsilon} \text{ and every } \varepsilon>0\ep \end{equation}

Rests on Definition A16.1, Lemma A16.7 and Definition A16.8.

Proof.

Derives Proposition A16.10. Write \(\rho_{\varepsilon}(\vect{z}) = \varepsilon^{-3}\tilde\rho\bigl(\abs{\vect{z}}/\varepsilon\bigr)\), where \(\tilde\rho(s) = c_{0}f(1-s^{2})\) is the radial profile supplied by Lemma A16.7. Decompose the first integral of Equation (A16.14) into spheres, \(\dd^{3}z = s^{2}\,\dd s\,\dd\Omega\) — the same decomposition already used in Lemma 14.58 to pass between a solid and a spherical integral, and legitimate here because the integrand is continuous on the compact ball:

\begin{equation}\tag{A16.18} u_{\varepsilon}(\vect{x}) = \int_{0}^{\varepsilon} \varepsilon^{-3}\tilde\rho\!\left(\frac{s}{\varepsilon}\right) s^{2}\left[\int_{S^{2}}u(\vect{x}-s\vect{n})\,\dd\Omega\right] \dd s\ep \end{equation}

The inner integral is unchanged under \(\vect{n} \longmapsto -\vect{n}\), which is a symmetry of the unit sphere and of its solid-angle element, so it equals \(\int_{S^{2}}u(\vect{x}+s\vect{n})\,\dd\Omega = 4\pi\,M_{u}(\vect{x},s)\). For \(\vect{x} \in \Omega_{\varepsilon}\) and \(0 < s \le \varepsilon\) the closed ball \(\overline{B(\vect{x},s)}\) lies in \(\Omega\), so the mean-value property Equation (A16.1) gives \(M_{u}(\vect{x},s) = u(\vect{x})\) — a constant, which comes out of the \(s\)-integral:

\begin{equation}\tag{A16.19} u_{\varepsilon}(\vect{x}) = u(\vect{x})\int_{0}^{\varepsilon} 4\pi s^{2}\,\varepsilon^{-3} \tilde\rho\!\left(\frac{s}{\varepsilon}\right)\dd s = u(\vect{x})\int_{\R^{3}}\rho_{\varepsilon}(\vect{z})\,\dd^{3}z = u(\vect{x})\ec \end{equation}

the middle step being Equation (A16.18) read backwards with \(u \equiv 1\), and the last being the normalization of Lemma A16.7.

Remark A16.11 (Why radial, and why the normalization matters).

Both hypotheses on \(\rho\) are used and neither can be dropped. Radial dependence is what lets the weight \(\rho_{\varepsilon}\) be pulled outside the angular integral in Equation (A16.18), leaving exactly a spherical mean for the hypothesis to act on; a non-radial bump would leave an angular weight and the mean-value property would say nothing about the result. Unit mass is what makes the surviving factor equal to \(1\) rather than to some other constant. The identity Equation (A16.17) is thus not an approximation statement — it is not \(u_{\varepsilon} \to u\), which holds for every continuous \(u\) — but an exact equality, valid for each \(\varepsilon\) separately, and that exactness is the whole content of the argument.

Proof of the theorem

Proof of Theorem A16.2. Derives Theorem A16.2. Smoothness. Let \(\vect{x}_{0} \in \Omega\). Since \(\Omega\) is open there is \(\varepsilon>0\) with \(\overline{B(\vect{x}_{0},2\varepsilon)} \subset \Omega\), and then \(B(\vect{x}_{0},\varepsilon) \subset \Omega_{\varepsilon}\). On \(\Omega_{\varepsilon}\) we have \(u = u_{\varepsilon}\) by Proposition A16.10, and \(u_{\varepsilon} \in C^{\infty}(\Omega_{\varepsilon})\) by Proposition A16.9. Hence \(u\) is \(C^{\infty}\) on a neighbourhood of \(\vect{x}_{0}\). Smoothness being a local property and \(\vect{x}_{0}\) arbitrary, \(u \in C^{\infty}(\Omega)\). Note that the smoothing parameter \(\varepsilon\) is allowed to depend on the point, as it must: no single \(\varepsilon\) works near \(\pp\Omega\).

Harmonicity. Now that \(u \in C^{2}(\Omega)\) is established, the argument of Theorem 14.69 applies without change, and we repeat it for completeness. Suppose \(\nabla^{2}u(\vect{x}_{0}) > 0\) for some \(\vect{x}_{0} \in \Omega\). By continuity of \(\nabla^{2}u\) there is \(r>0\) with \(\overline{B(\vect{x}_{0},r)} \subset \Omega\) and \(\nabla^{2}u > 0\) throughout that ball. Darboux's identity Equation (14.55) then gives, for \(0 < s \le r\),

\begin{equation}\tag{A16.20} \pp_{s}M_{u}(\vect{x}_{0},s) = \frac{1}{4\pi s^{2}} \int_{B(\vect{x}_{0},s)}\nabla^{2}u\,\dd^{3}y > 0\ec \end{equation}

so \(s \longmapsto M_{u}(\vect{x}_{0},s)\) is strictly increasing on \((0,r]\). But the mean-value property makes it constant, equal to \(u(\vect{x}_{0})\), on that whole interval — a contradiction. The case \(\nabla^{2}u(\vect{x}_{0}) < 0\) is the same argument with the inequalities reversed. Hence \(\nabla^{2}u \equiv 0\) on \(\Omega\), which is Definition 14.66.

The two classes coincide. A harmonic function is \(C^{2}\) by definition and has the mean-value property by the direct half of Theorem 14.69; conversely a continuous function with the mean-value property is harmonic by what has just been proved.

Corollary A16.12 (Harmonic functions are smooth).

Every harmonic function on \(\Omega\) is of class \(C^{\infty}(\Omega)\), although its definition (Definition 14.66) demands only \(C^{2}\). Rests on Theorems 14.69 and A16.2.

Proof.

Derives Corollary A16.12. A harmonic \(u\) is continuous and has the mean-value property (Theorem 14.69); Theorem A16.2 then returns \(u \in C^{\infty}(\Omega)\).

Corollary A16.13 (Locally uniform limits of harmonic functions).

If \(u_{n}\) are harmonic on \(\Omega\) and \(u_{n} \to u\) uniformly on every compact subset of \(\Omega\), then \(u\) is harmonic. Rests on Theorem A16.2 and Definition A16.1.

Proof.

Derives Corollary A16.13. \(u\) is continuous, being a locally uniform limit of continuous functions. Fix \(\vect{x}\) and \(r\) with \(\overline{B(\vect{x},r)}\subset\Omega\); the sphere \(\abs{\vect{y}-\vect{x}} = r\) is compact, so \(u_{n} \to u\) uniformly on it and the averages converge: \(M_{u}(\vect{x},r) = \lim_{n} M_{u_{n}}(\vect{x},r) = \lim_{n} u_{n}(\vect{x}) = u(\vect{x})\). Thus \(u\) is continuous with the mean-value property, and Theorem A16.2 applies. The corresponding statement with \(C^{2}\) convergence would be trivial; the point is that mere uniform convergence suffices, and it does so only because the characterization proved here does not mention derivatives at all.

Remark A16.14 (What is quoted here).

Nothing. The three inputs are the mean value theorem of one-variable calculus, uniform continuity of a continuous function on a compact set (Theorem 10.11), and the polar decomposition \(\dd^{3}z = s^{2}\,\dd s\,\dd\Omega\) of a volume integral, all of them already in force in Real Analysis and used by the chapter itself in Lemma 14.58. Every integrand appearing above is continuous on a compact region, so the Riemann integral of Real Analysis suffices throughout and no appeal to Lebesgue's theory — which this treatise does not build — is made or needed. In particular Lemma A16.3 is proved, not cited: the usual statement of differentiation under the integral sign is a dominated-convergence argument, and the compactness of the domain of integration replaces the domination here.

Remark A16.15 (The scope of the improvement).

The gain over Theorem 14.69 is not cosmetic. The \(C^{2}\) converse cannot be applied to a function one has only constructed as a limit, an average or a supremum, because such a function is typically known to be continuous and nothing more; the continuous converse can, and Corollary A16.13 is the first instance. It is also the cleanest statement of the rigidity of the Laplace equation: the second-order differential condition \(\nabla^{2}u=0\) is equivalent to a condition — Equation (A16.1) — that mentions no derivative whatever, and that is why solutions of it are automatically smooth while solutions of, say, the wave equation are not.

Remark A16.16.

The Mean-Value Property Characterizes Harmonic Functions discharges the proof obligation left open in Remark 14.70 and completes Theorem 14.69 of Partial Differential Equations. The chapter uses only the \(C^{2}\) form in what follows — the strong maximum principle Theorem 14.77 is proved from it — so nothing there depended on the present section; what the section adds is the equivalence that makes the mean-value property a definition of harmonicity rather than a consequence of one, and with it the stability under uniform limits recorded in Corollary A16.13. The mollifier constructed in A radial mollifier is the same device that underlies the smooth test functions of Fourier Analysis and Integral Transforms and the approximation arguments of Section 14.6.2.