Change of Variables in a Multiple Integral
This appendix proves Theorem 11.129 of Real Analysis: that a \(C^{1}\) change of coordinates \(\vect{\Phi}\) transports a multiple integral with the modulus of its Jacobian determinant as the weight, Equation (11.152). It is the one property of the multiple integral that the physical parts use on almost every page — every passage to polar, cylindrical or spherical coordinates is an instance — and it is the only one Real Analysis states without proof.
The derivation is elementary throughout: no measure theory, no Lebesgue convergence theorem, no fixed-point theorem, and nothing from outside this treatise. Two ingredients that the chapters state only in a weaker form are proved here rather than quoted — the multiplicativity of the determinant, which Linear Algebra and Representation Theory does not record, and iterated integration in \(\R^{N}\), which Remark 11.128 states for \(N=2\) and \(N=3\). One ingredient is genuinely constructed here and was not foreseen in the plan for this section: a continuous partition of unity, built from distance functions in Lemma A44.9. Without it the passage from a local statement to a global one cannot be made for a Riemann integral over a general region, and saying that no partition of unity is used would be false. It costs half a page and quotes nothing; see Remark A44.19.
Throughout, points of \(\R^{N}\) are written \(\vect{u}=(u^{1},\ldots,u^{N})\), and when the last coordinate is singled out we write \(\vect{u}=(\vect{u}',t)\) with \(\vect{u}'\in\R^{N-1}\) and \(t\in\R\). A box is a product \([a_{1},b_{1}]\times\cdots\times[a_{N},b_{N}]\) and a cube is a box with all edges equal. The support of a function \(f\) on an open \(V\subseteq\R^{N}\) is the closure of \(\set{\vect{x}\mid f(\vect{x})\neq0}\); we write \(f\in C_{c}(V)\) when \(f\) is continuous and that closure is a compact subset of \(V\), in which case the extension of \(f\) by zero is continuous on the whole of \(\R^{N}\) and vanishes off a box, so \(\int_{\R^{N}}f\) means the integral of that extension over any box containing the support (Definition 11.125), and is independent of the box.
What the derivation uses
From Real Analysis: the Darboux construction of the multiple integral (Definition 11.125), the integrability of a continuous function on a box (Theorem 11.40), uniform continuity on a compact set (Theorem 11.25), the one-variable substitution rule Equation (11.27), the mean value theorem (Theorem 11.35), the chain rule (Proposition 11.104) and the inverse function theorem (Corollary 11.113). From Linear Algebra and Representation Theory: the Leibniz expansion Equation (9.19) and the two properties read off it there — linearity in each column and antisymmetry under exchange of two columns. From Topological and Metric Spaces: compactness (Definition 10.9), the Heine–Borel theorem in \(\R^{N}\) (Theorem 10.12) and the Lebesgue number lemma (Lemma 10.30).
For real \(N\times N\) matrices \(A\) and \(B\), \(\det(AB)=\det A\,\det B\). Rests on Equation (9.19).
Derives Lemma A44.1. Write \((AB)^{i}{}_{j}=\sum_{k}A^{i}{}_{k}B^{k}{}_{j}\) and expand Equation (9.19), distributing the product over \(j\):
the interchange being a finite rearrangement. The inner sum is, by Equation (9.19) again, the determinant of the matrix whose \(j\)-th column is the \(k_{j}\)-th column of \(A\). If two of the \(k_{j}\) coincide that matrix has a repeated column and the determinant vanishes, so only the tuples with \(k_{j}=\tau(j)\) for a permutation \(\tau\) survive; and bringing the columns back into their natural order costs \(\sgn(\tau)\), by the antisymmetry recorded after Equation (9.19). Hence the inner sum equals \(\sgn(\tau)\det A\) and
Sets of zero content
The Darboux construction ignores sets that can be covered by finitely many boxes of arbitrarily small total volume. That notion — zero content — is strictly stronger than the measure zero of Section 11.12, which allows countably many covering sets; it is the one a Riemann sum can see, and it is the one used here.
A bounded set \(Z\subset\R^{N}\) has zero content if for every \(\varepsilon>0\) there are finitely many cubes of total volume less than \(\varepsilon\) whose union contains \(Z\). Rests on Definitions 10.9 and 11.125.
Covering by cubes rather than by boxes is no restriction: a box with edges \(a_{1},\ldots,a_{N}\) is covered by cubes of side \(h\) in number at most \(\prod_{i}\left(a_{i}/h+1\right)\), of total volume at most \(\prod_{i}\left(a_{i}+h\right)\), which tends to the volume of the box as \(h\to0\). A finite union of sets of zero content has zero content.
Let \(R\) be a box, \(Z\subset R\) of zero content, and \(f:R\to\R\) bounded with \(\abs{f}\le M\).
-
If \(f\) is continuous at every point of \(R\setminus Z\), then \(f\) is integrable on \(R\).
-
If \(f\) vanishes off \(Z\), then \(f\) is integrable with \(\int_{R}f=0\).
-
If \(E_{1},\ldots,E_{m}\subseteq R\) are such that each characteristic function \(\chi_{E_{i}}\) is integrable, the \(E_{i}\) cover a set \(E\) and the pairwise intersections \(E_{i}\cap E_{j}\) (\(i\neq j\)) have zero content, then \(\int_{E}f=\sum_{i}\int_{E_{i}}f\) for every \(f\) for which the left-hand side is defined.
Rests on Definition A44.2, Theorem 11.25 and Definition 11.125.
Derives Lemma A44.3. (1) Given \(\varepsilon>0\), cover \(Z\) by finitely many open cubes of total volume less than \(\varepsilon\) and let \(K\) be the complement in \(R\) of their union: \(K\) is closed and bounded, hence compact (Theorem 10.12). Note that \(f\) is continuous, as a function on \(R\), at every point of \(K\).
We claim there is \(\lambda>0\) such that any subset of \(R\) of diameter less than \(\lambda\) which meets \(K\) carries an oscillation of \(f\) of at most \(\varepsilon\). If not, then for each \(j\) there are \(\vect{x}_{j}\in K\) and \(\vect{y}_{j},\vect{z}_{j}\in R\) within \(1/j\) of \(\vect{x}_{j}\) with \(\abs{f(\vect{y}_{j})-f(\vect{z}_{j})}>\varepsilon\); by compactness a subsequence \(\vect{x}_{j}\) converges to some \(\vect{x}\in K\), the corresponding \(\vect{y}_{j}\) and \(\vect{z}_{j}\) converge to \(\vect{x}\) as well, and the continuity of \(f\) at \(\vect{x}\) makes both \(f(\vect{y}_{j})\) and \(f(\vect{z}_{j})\) tend to \(f(\vect{x})\) — a contradiction.
Now partition \(R\) with mesh smaller than \(\lambda/\sqrt{N}\). Writing \(A\) for the union of the covering cubes, every sub-box either lies inside \(A\) or meets \(K=R\setminus A\). Those of the first kind have total volume at most \(\operatorname{vol}(A)<\varepsilon\) and contribute at most \(2M\varepsilon\) to the gap between the upper and the lower sum; on those of the second kind the oscillation of \(f\) is at most \(\varepsilon\), contributing at most \(\varepsilon\operatorname{vol}(R)\). The gap can therefore be made as small as desired, and \(f\) is integrable (Definition 11.125).
(2) By (1), \(f\) is integrable, since it is continuous (with value zero) off \(Z\). Cover \(Z\) by finitely many cubes of total volume less than \(\varepsilon\) and partition \(R\) with a mesh small compared with the smallest of those cubes. Every sub-box on which \(f\) is not identically zero meets \(Z\), hence lies in the union of the cubes enlarged by one mesh on every side, whose volume is then at most \(2\varepsilon\); so \(\abs{\int_{R}f}\le2M\varepsilon\) for every \(\varepsilon>0\).
(3) The function \(\chi_{E}-\sum_{i}\chi_{E_{i}}\) vanishes off \(\bigcup_{i<j}\left(E_{i}\cap E_{j}\right)\), a set of zero content, and is bounded by \(m\); multiplying by \(f\) and applying (2) gives the statement.
∎-
Let \(B\subset\R^{N-1}\) be a box and \(g:B\to\R\) continuous. Then the graph \(\set{(\vect{u}',g(\vect{u}'))\mid \vect{u}'\in B}\) has zero content in \(\R^{N}\); so does its intersection with any coordinate hyperplane, and so does a face of a box.
-
Let \(W\subseteq\R^{N}\) be open, \(\vect{F}:W\to\R^{N}\) of class \(C^{1}\), and \(Z\subset W\) a compact set of zero content. Then \(\vect{F}(Z)\) has zero content.
Rests on Lemma A44.3, Theorem 11.25 and Theorem 11.35.
Derives Lemma A44.4. (1) Let \(\varepsilon>0\). By uniform continuity (Theorem 11.25) there is \(\delta>0\) such that \(g\) varies by less than \(\varepsilon\) on any subset of \(B\) of diameter less than \(\delta\). Cover \(B\) by cubes of side \(h<\min\set{\delta/\sqrt{N-1},\varepsilon}\), in number at most \(C_{B}h^{-(N-1)}\) with \(C_{B}\) depending on \(B\) alone. Over each such cube the graph lies in a box of base that cube and height \(\varepsilon\), which is covered by \(\lceil\varepsilon/h\rceil\) cubes of side \(h\), of total volume at most \(\left(\varepsilon+h\right)h^{N-1}\le2\varepsilon h^{N-1}\). Summing gives a total volume at most \(2C_{B}\varepsilon\). A face of a box is the graph of a constant function.
(2) Cover \(Z\) by finitely many closed balls contained in \(W\); on each, the entries of \(D\vect{F}\) are bounded, and the mean value theorem (Theorem 11.35) applied to each component along the segment joining two points of the ball — which stays in the ball, the ball being convex — gives a constant \(L\) with \(\abs{\vect{F}(\vect{x})-\vect{F}(\vect{y})}\le L\abs{\vect{x}-\vect{y}}\) there. Take \(L\) to be the largest of the finitely many constants. Now cover \(Z\) by cubes of side \(h\) and total volume less than \(\varepsilon\), refining \(h\) so small that each such cube meeting \(Z\) lies in one of the balls. A cube of side \(h\) has diameter \(\sqrt{N}h\), so its image has diameter at most \(L\sqrt{N}h\) and lies in a cube of that side, of volume \(\left(L\sqrt{N}\right)^{N}h^{N}\). The images therefore cover \(\vect{F}(Z)\) with total volume at most \(\left(L\sqrt{N}\right)^{N}\varepsilon\).
∎Iterated integration in $\R^{N}$
Let \(R=R'\times[a,b]\) be a box in \(\R^{N}=\R^{N-1}\times\R\) and let \(f:R\to\R\) be bounded and integrable, and such that \(t\longmapsto f(\vect{u}',t)\) is integrable on \([a,b]\) for every \(\vect{u}'\in R'\). Then
the inner integral being an integrable function of \(\vect{u}'\). The same holds with any one of the \(N\) coordinates in the role of \(t\). Rests on Definition 11.125, Definition 11.39 and Theorem 11.40.
Derives Lemma A44.5. Write \(F(\vect{u}')=\int_{a}^{b}f(\vect{u}',t)\,\dd t\). Let \(P'\) be a partition of \(R'\) into sub-boxes \(S'\) and \(P_{t}\) a partition \(a=t_{0}<\cdots<t_{n}=b\); together they partition \(R\) into the sub-boxes \(S=S'\times[t_{i-1},t_{i}]\). Fix \(\vect{u}'\in S'\). For each \(i\) and every \(t\in[t_{i-1},t_{i}]\) one has \(f(\vect{u}',t)\ge\inf_{S}f\), so
the right-hand side being independent of \(\vect{u}'\in S'\); hence it is a lower bound for \(\inf_{S'}F\). Multiplying by \(\operatorname{vol}(S')\) and summing over \(S'\) gives \(L(F,P')\ge L(f,P)\), where \(L\) denotes the lower Darboux sum Equation (11.22). The mirror argument gives \(U(F,P')\le U(f,P)\). Since \(f\) is integrable, the outer sums squeeze: for every \(\varepsilon>0\) a partition \(P\) with \(U(f,P)-L(f,P)<\varepsilon\) yields \(U(F,P')-L(F,P')<\varepsilon\), so \(F\) is integrable on \(R'\), and both \(\int_{R'}F\) and \(\int_{R}f\) lie between \(L(f,P)\) and \(U(f,P)\); letting \(\varepsilon\to0\) makes them equal. Relabelling the coordinates puts any chosen one in the role of \(t\).
∎Let \(f\in C_{c}(\R^{N})\) and let \(\sigma\) be a permutation of \(\set{1,\ldots,N}\). Then \(\int_{\R^{N}}f\) equals the iterated integral taken in the order \(u^{\sigma(N)},u^{\sigma(N-1)},\ldots,u^{\sigma(1)}\) from innermost to outermost; consequently \(\int_{\R^{N}}f\circ\sigma=\int_{\R^{N}}f\), where \(\sigma\) also denotes the map \(\vect{u}\mapsto\left(u^{\sigma(1)},\ldots,u^{\sigma(N)}\right)\). Rests on Lemma A44.5 and Theorem 11.40.
Derives Corollary A44.6. Take a box \(R\) containing the support in its interior. A continuous function is integrable on \(R\) and on every slice (Theorem 11.40), so Lemma A44.5 applies with any chosen coordinate innermost; the inner integral is again continuous, by the uniform continuity of \(f\) on the compact \(R\) (Theorem 11.25), so the lemma may be applied again to it, and \(N\) applications reduce \(\int_{R}f\) to the iterated integral in the chosen order. All \(N!\) orders therefore give the same number. Finally \(f\circ\sigma\) is continuous with compact support, and its iterated integral in the order \(u^{1},\ldots,u^{N}\) becomes, on renaming the integration variable of the \(j\)-th integration from \(u^{j}\) to \(u^{\sigma(j)}\), the iterated integral of \(f\) in the order \(u^{\sigma(1)},\ldots,u^{\sigma(N)}\), which is \(\int_{\R^{N}}f\).
∎Two reductions
Let \(U,V\subseteq\R^{N}\) be open and \(\vect{\Phi}:U\to V\) a \(C^{1}\) diffeomorphism. We say \(\vect{\Phi}\) has the substitution property if
both integrands being understood as extended by zero; the right-hand one belongs to \(C_{c}(U)\), its support being \(\vect{\Phi}^{-1}(\operatorname{supp}f)\). Rests on Corollary 11.113 and Definition 11.125.
If \(\vect{\Phi}:U\to V\) and \(\vect{\Psi}:V\to W\) are \(C^{1}\) diffeomorphisms with the substitution property, so is \(\vect{\Psi}\circ\vect{\Phi}\). Rests on Definition A44.7, Proposition 11.104 and Lemma A44.1.
Derives Lemma A44.8. Let \(g\in C_{c}(W)\). Then \(f:=\left(g\circ\vect{\Psi}\right)\abs{\det D\vect{\Psi}}\) lies in \(C_{c}(V)\), and applying Equation (A44.5) first to \(\vect{\Psi}\) and then to \(\vect{\Phi}\),
By the chain rule (Proposition 11.104), \(D\left(\vect{\Psi}\circ\vect{\Phi}\right)(\vect{u}) =D\vect{\Psi}\left(\vect{\Phi}(\vect{u})\right)D\vect{\Phi}(\vect{u})\), and Lemma A44.1 turns the product of the two moduli into \(\abs{\det D\left(\vect{\Psi}\circ\vect{\Phi}\right)}\).
∎Let \(K\subset\R^{N}\) be compact and \(W_{1},\ldots,W_{m}\) open sets with \(K\subseteq W_{1}\cup\cdots\cup W_{m}\). There are continuous functions \(\lambda_{1},\ldots,\lambda_{m}\) on \(\R^{N}\) with \(0\le\lambda_{j}\le1\), with \(\operatorname{supp}\lambda_{j}\) compact and contained in \(W_{j}\), and with \(\sum_{j}\lambda_{j}=1\) on a neighbourhood of \(K\). Rests on Definitions 10.6, 10.9 and 10.24.
Derives Lemma A44.9. For each \(\vect{x}\in K\) choose \(j(\vect{x})\) with \(\vect{x}\in W_{j(\vect{x})}\) and \(r(\vect{x})>0\) with the closed ball of radius \(2r(\vect{x})\) about \(\vect{x}\) inside \(W_{j(\vect{x})}\). The open balls of radius \(r(\vect{x})\) cover \(K\); extract a finite subcover (Definition 10.9) with centres \(\vect{x}_{1},\ldots,\vect{x}_{p}\) and let \(K_{j}\) be the union of the closed balls \(\overline{B}_{r(\vect{x}_{i})}(\vect{x}_{i})\) with \(j(\vect{x}_{i})=j\). Each \(K_{j}\) is compact and contained in \(W_{j}\), and \(K\subseteq\bigcup_{j}K_{j}\). Let \(\rho_{j}>0\) be smaller than the distance from \(K_{j}\) to the complement of \(W_{j}\) — positive because \(K_{j}\) is compact and the complement closed — and put
which is continuous, non-negative, strictly positive exactly on the open set \(\set{\operatorname{dist}(\cdot,K_{j})<\rho_{j}}\), and supported in its closure, a compact subset of \(W_{j}\). On the open set \(O=\set{\sum_{i}\psi_{i}>0}\), which contains \(K\), set \(\lambda_{j}=\psi_{j}/\sum_{i}\psi_{i}\); off \(O\) set \(\lambda_{j}=0\). Each \(\lambda_{j}\) is continuous on \(O\) and vanishes on a neighbourhood of every point of \(\R^{N}\setminus\operatorname{supp}\psi_{j}\), so it is continuous everywhere; its support lies in that of \(\psi_{j}\); and \(\sum_{j}\lambda_{j}=1\) on \(O\).
∎Let \(\vect{\Phi}:U\to V\) be a \(C^{1}\) diffeomorphism and suppose every \(\vect{p}\in U\) has an open neighbourhood \(N_{\vect{p}}\subseteq U\) such that the restriction \(\vect{\Phi}|_{N_{\vect{p}}}:N_{\vect{p}}\to\vect{\Phi}(N_{\vect{p}})\) has the substitution property. Then \(\vect{\Phi}\) has it. Rests on Lemma A44.9, Definition A44.7 and Definition 10.9.
Derives Lemma A44.10. Let \(f\in C_{c}(V)\) with \(K=\operatorname{supp}f\). The set \(\vect{\Phi}^{-1}(K)\) is compact, so finitely many \(N_{\vect{p}_{1}},\ldots,N_{\vect{p}_{m}}\) cover it, and the open sets \(W_{j}=\vect{\Phi}(N_{\vect{p}_{j}})\subseteq V\) cover \(K\). Take \(\lambda_{1},\ldots,\lambda_{m}\) as in Lemma A44.9. Each \(\lambda_{j}f\) is continuous, vanishes off \(\operatorname{supp}\lambda_{j}\cap K\) — a compact subset of \(W_{j}\) — and hence lies in \(C_{c}(W_{j})\); and \(\sum_{j}\lambda_{j}f=f\), since the two sides agree on the neighbourhood of \(K\) where \(\sum_{j}\lambda_{j}=1\) and both vanish off \(K\). Applying the substitution property of \(\vect{\Phi}|_{N_{\vect{p}_{j}}}\) to \(\lambda_{j}f\) and summing over \(j\),
the first and last steps by the linearity of the integral over a box containing every support involved.
∎Permutations and primitive maps
For a permutation \(\sigma\) of \(\set{1,\ldots,N}\), the linear map \(\vect{u}\longmapsto\left(u^{\sigma(1)},\ldots,u^{\sigma(N)}\right)\) of \(\R^{N}\) onto itself has the substitution property. Rests on Corollary A44.6 and Equation (9.19).
Derives Lemma A44.11. Its matrix has exactly one \(1\) in each row and column, so Equation (9.19) leaves a single term and the determinant is \(\sgn(\sigma)=\pm1\); hence \(\abs{\det}=1\) and Equation (A44.5) reduces to \(\int f=\int f\circ\sigma\), which is Corollary A44.6. This is the only step of the whole derivation at which the sign of the determinant is disposed of, and it is why Equation (11.152) carries a modulus while Equation (9.19) does not.
∎A \(C^{1}\) diffeomorphism \(\vect{\Phi}:U\to V\) of open subsets of \(\R^{N}\) is primitive if it changes only the last coordinate:
the determinant being that of a triangular matrix with \(N-1\) unit diagonal entries. Rests on Definition 11.98 and Equation (9.19).
Every primitive \(C^{1}\) diffeomorphism has the substitution property. Rests on Definition A44.12, Equation (11.27) and Lemma A44.5.
Derives Lemma A44.13. Let \(f\in C_{c}(V)\) and write \(g=\left(f\circ\vect{\Phi}\right)\abs{\pp_{t}\Phi^{N}}\in C_{c}(U)\). Both \(f\) and \(g\), extended by zero, are continuous with compact support, so by Corollary A44.6 each integral is the iterated integral with \(t\) innermost. It therefore suffices to prove, for every fixed \(\vect{u}'\in\R^{N-1}\),
Fix \(\vect{u}'\) and put \(U_{\vect{u}'}=\set{t\mid(\vect{u}',t)\in U}\) and \(V_{\vect{u}'}=\set{s\mid(\vect{u}',s)\in V}\), both open in \(\R\). Because \(\vect{\Phi}\) leaves \(\vect{u}'\) untouched and is a bijection of \(U\) onto \(V\), the map \(\varphi(t)=\Phi^{N}(\vect{u}',t)\) is a bijection of \(U_{\vect{u}'}\) onto \(V_{\vect{u}'}\); it is \(C^{1}\) with \(\varphi'=\pp_{t}\Phi^{N}\neq0\), hence strictly monotone on each connected component of \(U_{\vect{u}'}\), mapping that component onto a component of \(V_{\vect{u}'}\).
The integrand on the right of Equation (A44.10) vanishes off the compact set \(\vect{\Phi}^{-1}(\operatorname{supp}f)\), whose slice at \(\vect{u}'\) is a compact subset \(T\) of \(U_{\vect{u}'}\). The components of \(U_{\vect{u}'}\) are open and disjoint and cover \(T\), so only finitely many of them, \(I_{1},\ldots,I_{q}\), meet \(T\); choose in each a compact interval \([\alpha_{r},\beta_{r}]\subset I_{r}\) containing \(T\cap I_{r}\), with \(\alpha_{r}<\beta_{r}\). On \(I_{r}\) the substitution rule Equation (11.27), applied to the \(C^{1}\) function \(\varphi\) and the continuous \(s\mapsto f(\vect{u}',s)\), gives
If \(\varphi\) increases on \(I_{r}\) then \(\varphi'=\abs{\varphi'}\) and the right-hand side is the integral over \(\left[\varphi(\alpha_{r}),\varphi(\beta_{r})\right]\); if \(\varphi\) decreases then \(\varphi'=-\abs{\varphi'}\) and the right-hand side is minus the integral over \(\left[\varphi(\beta_{r}),\varphi(\alpha_{r})\right]\). In both cases
Outside \(\left[\alpha_{r},\beta_{r}\right]\) the left integrand vanishes, so the left-hand side is the integral over the whole of \(I_{r}\); and \(f(\vect{u}',\cdot)\) vanishes on \(\varphi(I_{r})\setminus \varphi\left(\left[\alpha_{r},\beta_{r}\right]\right)\), since a point \(s\) there has \(\varphi^{-1}(s)\notin T\), so the right-hand side is the integral over the component \(\varphi(I_{r})\) of \(V_{\vect{u}'}\). Summing over \(r=1,\ldots,q\) and noting that \(f(\vect{u}',\cdot)\) vanishes on the components of \(V_{\vect{u}'}\) not among the \(\varphi(I_{r})\), and off \(V_{\vect{u}'}\) altogether, gives Equation (A44.10).
∎The local factorisation
Let \(\vect{\Phi}\) be a \(C^{1}\) diffeomorphism of an open subset of \(\R^{N}\) onto an open subset, and let \(\vect{p}\) be a point of its domain. Then some neighbourhood of \(\vect{p}\) carries a factorisation of \(\vect{\Phi}\) as a composition of finitely many primitive maps and coordinate permutations. Rests on Corollary 11.113, Definition A44.12 and Proposition 11.104.
Derives Lemma A44.14. Say that a \(C^{1}\) diffeomorphism \(\vect{\Theta}\) defined near a point is \(m\)-adapted there, \(1\le m\le N+1\), if \(\Theta^{i}(\vect{u})=u^{i}\) for every \(i<m\) throughout a neighbourhood. Every diffeomorphism is \(1\)-adapted (the condition is empty), and an \((N+1)\)-adapted one is the identity. We show that an \(m\)-adapted \(\vect{\Theta}\) is, near the point, the composition of an \((m+1)\)-adapted diffeomorphism with one primitive map and one transposition of coordinates; \(N\) applications then prove the lemma, since a primitive map in the \(m\)-th coordinate is a transposition conjugate of one in the last coordinate.
Let \(\vect{\Theta}\) be \(m\)-adapted at \(\vect{q}\). Its Jacobian there has the block form
with \(\identity\) of size \(m-1\) and \(C\) the matrix \(\pp\Theta^{i}/\pp u^{j}\) with \(i,j\ge m\); expanding the determinant along the first \(m-1\) rows shows \(\det C=\det D\vect{\Theta}\neq0\), so the rows of \(C\) are independent and in particular the row \(\left(\pp\Theta^{m}/\pp u^{j}\right)_{j\ge m}\) is non-zero: there is \(j\ge m\) with \(\pp\Theta^{m}/\pp u^{j}(\vect{q})\neq0\).
Let \(\tau\) be the transposition of the coordinates \(m\) and \(j\), and set
a map changing only the \(m\)-th coordinate. At \(\vect{q}'=\tau(\vect{q})\) its \(m\)-th partial derivative in the \(m\)-th coordinate is \(\pp\Theta^{m}/\pp u^{j}(\vect{q})\neq0\), so \(\det D\vect{\varsigma}(\vect{q}')\neq0\) and, by the inverse function theorem (Corollary 11.113), \(\vect{\varsigma}\) is a \(C^{1}\) diffeomorphism of a neighbourhood of \(\vect{q}'\) onto an open set; it is a primitive map in the \(m\)-th coordinate.
Put \(\vect{\Xi}=\vect{\Theta}\circ\tau\circ\vect{\varsigma}^{-1}\), so that \(\vect{\Theta}=\vect{\Xi}\circ\vect{\varsigma}\circ\tau\) near \(\vect{q}\) (\(\tau\) being its own inverse). For \(i<m\), neither \(\tau\) nor \(\vect{\varsigma}\) — hence nor \(\vect{\varsigma}^{-1}\) — touches the \(i\)-th coordinate, and \(\vect{\Theta}\) preserves it, so \(\Xi^{i}(\vect{v})=v^{i}\). For \(i=m\): writing \(\vect{u}=\vect{\varsigma}^{-1}(\vect{v})\) one has \(v^{m}=\varsigma^{m}(\vect{u})=\Theta^{m}\left(\tau(\vect{u})\right) =\Xi^{m}(\vect{v})\). Hence \(\vect{\Xi}\) is \((m+1)\)-adapted, as claimed.
∎Every \(C^{1}\) diffeomorphism \(\vect{\Phi}:U\to V\) of open subsets of \(\R^{N}\) has the substitution property: for every \(f\in C_{c}(V)\),
Derives Proposition A44.15. By Lemma A44.14 each point of \(U\) has a neighbourhood on which \(\vect{\Phi}\) is a composition of primitive maps and permutations; each factor has the substitution property by Lemmas A44.11 and A44.13, so the composition has it by Lemma A44.8. Thus \(\vect{\Phi}\) has the property locally, and Lemma A44.10 globalises it.
∎From compact support to the theorem
Proposition A44.15 carries no hypothesis on the shape of \(U\) and \(V\). To reach Theorem 11.129 as stated — an integrand merely continuous and bounded on \(V\), not vanishing near the boundary — something must be assumed about that boundary, and about the behaviour of \(\vect{\Phi}\) there; otherwise neither integral need exist. The hypotheses below hold for every use made of the formula in this treatise.
Let \(V\subset\R^{N}\) be open and bounded and suppose its boundary is contained in finitely many graphs of continuous functions over boxes, in the sense of Lemma A44.4(1) with the coordinates permuted — the \(N\)-dimensional reading of Definition 11.127. Define the boundary strip
Then the content of \(V_{\delta}\) tends to zero as \(\delta\to0\). Rests on Lemma A44.4, Theorem 11.25 and Definition 11.127.
Derives Lemma A44.16. It is enough to treat one graph \(\Gamma\), of a continuous \(g\) over a box \(B\subset\R^{N-1}\), and to bound the content of its \(\delta\)-neighbourhood. By uniform continuity (Theorem 11.25) split \(B\) into cubes of side \(h\) on each of which \(g\) varies by less than \(\delta\). A point within distance \(\delta\) of \(\Gamma\) and lying over such a cube has last coordinate within \(2\delta\) of the value of \(g\) at the cube's centre, and lies over the cube enlarged by \(\delta\); so the neighbourhood is covered by boxes of total volume at most \(4\delta\left(\operatorname{vol}(B)+C\delta\right)\) with \(C\) depending on \(B\) alone. Letting first \(h\to0\) and then \(\delta\to0\) gives the claim; the finitely many graphs are summed.
∎Let \(U,V\subseteq\R^{N}\) be open and bounded and let \(\vect{\Phi}:U\to V\) be a bijection of class \(C^{1}\) with \(\det D\vect{\Phi}\neq0\) everywhere. Assume in addition that \(\vect{\Phi}\) is the restriction of a \(C^{1}\) diffeomorphism of an open set containing \(\overline{U}\), and that \(\pp U\) and \(\pp V\) are as in Lemma A44.16. Then for every bounded continuous \(f\) on \(V\) both integrals in Equation (11.152) exist and are equal. Rests on Proposition A44.15, Lemma A44.16 and Lemma A44.3.
Derives Theorem A44.17. Existence. Extend \(f\) by zero to a box \(R\supseteq\overline{V}\). The extension is bounded and continuous off \(\pp V\), which has zero content by Lemma A44.4(1); so it is integrable by Lemma A44.3(1). The same argument applies on the \(U\) side: \(\left(f\circ\vect{\Phi}\right) \abs{\det D\vect{\Phi}}\) is bounded there, because \(D\vect{\Phi}\) extends continuously to the compact \(\overline{U}\), and continuous off \(\pp U\).
Equality. Let \(M\) bound \(\abs{f}\) and \(J\) bound \(\abs{\det D\vect{\Phi}}\) on \(\overline{U}\). For \(\delta>0\) put
a continuous function, zero where the distance is at most \(\delta\) and one where it is at least \(2\delta\). The set where \(\eta_{\delta}\neq0\) has closure inside \(\set{\operatorname{dist}(\cdot,\R^{N}\setminus V)\ge\delta}\), which is closed and bounded, hence a compact subset of \(V\); so \(f_{\delta}=\eta_{\delta}f\) lies in \(C_{c}(V)\) and Proposition A44.15 gives
On the left, \(f-f_{\delta}\) vanishes outside \(V_{2\delta}\) and is bounded by \(M\), so the difference of the two integrals is at most \(M\) times the content of \(V_{2\delta}\), which tends to zero by Lemma A44.16. On the right, the integrands differ only on \(\vect{\Phi}^{-1}(V_{2\delta})\) and by at most \(MJ\). The extension of \(\vect{\Phi}^{-1}\) is \(C^{1}\) on a neighbourhood of the compact \(\overline{V}\), hence Lipschitz there with some constant \(L\) by the argument of Lemma A44.4(2); covering \(V_{2\delta}\) by cubes of total volume \(\varepsilon\) and taking images covers \(\vect{\Phi}^{-1}(V_{2\delta})\) with total volume at most \(\left(L\sqrt{N}\right)^{N}\varepsilon\), so its content also tends to zero. Letting \(\delta\to0\) in Equation (A44.18) gives Equation (11.152).
∎Let \(U,V\) be open and bounded, let \(Z\subset U\) be closed in \(U\) and contained in finitely many graphs of continuous functions over boxes, and let \(\vect{\Phi}:U\to V\) be \(C^{1}\), mapping \(U\setminus Z\) bijectively onto \(V\setminus\vect{\Phi}(Z)\) with non-vanishing Jacobian there. If \(\vect{\Phi}\) extends \(C^{1}\) to a neighbourhood of \(\overline{U}\), then Equation (11.152) holds for every \(f\in C_{c}(V)\), and for bounded continuous \(f\) under the boundary hypotheses of Theorem A44.17 applied to \(U\setminus Z\) and \(V\setminus\vect{\Phi}(Z)\). Rests on Theorem A44.17, Lemma A44.4 and Lemma A44.3.
Derives Corollary A44.18. \(U\setminus Z\) is open, and \(\vect{\Phi}|_{U\setminus Z}\) is a \(C^{1}\) diffeomorphism onto the open set \(V\setminus\vect{\Phi}(Z)\); note that \(\vect{\Phi}(Z\cap K)\) has zero content for every compact \(K\subset\overline{U}\), by Lemma A44.4. Apply Proposition A44.15, or Theorem A44.17, to that restriction. Both integrals change by nothing when the sets \(Z\) and \(\vect{\Phi}(Z)\) are restored, because the integrands are bounded and the two sets have zero content (Lemma A44.3(2)).
∎The corollary is what licenses the two Jacobians of Example 11.130. The polar map \(\vect{\Phi}(\rho,\varphi)=(\rho\cos\varphi,\rho\sin\varphi)\) of Equation (11.153) has \(\det D\vect{\Phi}=\rho\), which vanishes on the segment \(\rho=0\), and it fails to be injective unless \(\varphi\) is confined to an interval of length \(2\pi\), so that a ray must be removed from the image; segment and ray are each contained in the graph of a continuous function, and neither contributes to either integral. The spherical map is degenerate on the polar axis in the same way.
Reading the result
Nothing outside this treatise, and no result of Real Analysis beyond the ones listed in What the derivation uses. Three points are worth recording, because each is a place where the chapters state slightly less than the derivation needs and the gap is filled here rather than passed over.
First, Linear Algebra and Representation Theory records the Leibniz expansion Equation (9.19) and reads off column linearity and antisymmetry, but never states that the determinant is multiplicative; that is Lemma A44.1, proved above from the expansion alone. It is a debt of Part II, small but real: the composition rule for Jacobians is used wherever coordinates are changed twice.
Second, Remark 11.128 states the reduction of a multiple integral to an iterated one for \(N=2\) and \(N=3\) only. The \(N\)-dimensional statement is Lemma A44.5, proved here by the same Darboux squeeze. This too is a Part II debt, and it is the reason Theorem 11.129 could not simply be quoted from the chapter's own machinery.
Third — and this corrects the plan under which this section was written — the passage from a local identity to a global one does use a partition of unity. It is a continuous one, constructed in Lemma A44.9 out of distance functions and nothing else; no smooth bump function is needed, because \(f\) is only assumed continuous. There is no fixed-point theorem, no convergence theorem of Lebesgue integration and no measure theory anywhere in the section: every set that is discarded is discarded because it has zero content (Definition A44.2), which a Darboux sum can see, and not merely measure zero in the sense of Section 11.12.
Proposition A44.15, the compactly supported form, is the theorem proper: it holds for arbitrary open \(U\) and \(V\) and is where all the work is. The extra hypotheses of Theorem A44.17 — a boundary made of finitely many graphs, and a \(C^{1}\) extension across \(\overline{U}\) — are not artefacts of the method. Without some such assumption the two integrals in Equation (11.152) need not exist at all: a bounded continuous function on a bounded open set with a sufficiently wild boundary is not Riemann integrable, and the statement of Theorem 11.129 that “both integrals exist” is then false rather than unproved. The chapter's phrasing should be read with these hypotheses supplied; they hold in every application made in this book, where the regions are simple in the sense of Definition 11.127 and the maps are restrictions of diffeomorphisms defined on larger open sets. Rests on Theorem A44.17, Proposition A44.15 and Definition 11.127.
Change of Variables in a Multiple Integral discharges the derivation owed at Theorem 11.129 of Real Analysis. The result is cashed in three places. It is what makes the surface integral Equation (11.148) independent of the parametrization used to define it, as Remark 11.134 states explicitly: two parametrizations of one surface differ by a \(C^{1}\) diffeomorphism of their parameter domains, and the Jacobian factor supplied by Equation (11.152) cancels the corresponding factor in \(\pp_{u}\vect{r}\times\pp_{v}\vect{r}\) — so the flux, and with it Theorem 11.133 and Theorem 11.132, is well defined. It supplies the polar and spherical volume elements of Example 11.130, used throughout the physical parts and, in this appendix alone, in The Helmholtz Decomposition. And it is the statement behind the invariance of phase-space volume, Corollary 26.24 of Part III, where the relevant map is the Hamiltonian flow and the Jacobian determinant is the one Liouville's theorem shows to be unity.