remark 33.10 Fibre anelasticity, and why it biases one method and not the other

open in the book · parts/03-classical-mechanics/16-exp-cavendish.tex:566 · p. 1126

Rests on

Supports

Nothing declares a dependency on this node yet.

Neighborhood

Every logical edge within two steps of this node.

remark 33.10: Fibre anelasticity, and why it biases one method and not the other33.10equation 33.12: eq:expcav-tos33.12theorem 17.78: Causality implies dispersion relations17.78definition 17.29: Fourier transform; the treatise convention17.29equation 8.16: eq:cpx-simple-pole8.16lemma 8.9: ML estimate8.9proposition 17.67: Holomorphy17.67proposition 17.42: Sokhotski–Plemelj17.42theorem 8.12: Cauchy8.12remark 28.26: Causality is visible in the susceptibility28.26remark 28.62: Neither velocity is a speed limit28.62proof : ch:15-fourier-integral-transforms@proof-49proof

Edges

typedirectionnode provenancewhere
cites Does the Time-of-Swing Method Give a Correct Value of the Newtonian Gravitational Constant? derived parts/03-classical-mechanics/16-exp-cavendish.tex:575
depends_on eq:expcav-tos declared parts/03-classical-mechanics/16-exp-cavendish.tex:593
depends_on Causality implies dispersion relations declared parts/03-classical-mechanics/16-exp-cavendish.tex:593